E3A-Polytech 2024 : corrigé d’anglais

Proposition de corrigé — non officielle. Synthèse en anglais de l’épreuve 2024 sur les médias, la désinformation et l’intelligence artificielle.

Télécharger ce corrigé en PDF · Ouvrir le sujet officiel · Télécharger une copie du sujet · Retrouver les annales

Synthèse proposée

Learning to trust news critically

The Reuters Institute (2022), CNN (May 2021), The Economist (September 2023) and The New York | Times (February 2020) examine how people access and assess information. Together they suggest that reliable public debate depends less on | confidence alone than on habits of verification, especially as technology changes the production of news. Access already varies strongly by | age. The British chart in doc.1 shows online sources dominating among younger respondents, while television matters more to older groups. | Social media accounts for twenty four percent of the youngest group’s main news source, against two percent among those over | fifty five. However, online access does not establish whether someone can recognise misleading content. Indeed, doc.2 describes a gap between | confidence and ability among American participants. Many overestimate their skills, with the least capable often least aware of their limitations. | Politically appealing claims can encourage belief and sharing. The problem is therefore not only the supply of false information: users’ | judgments and motivations also help it circulate. Artificial intelligence may intensify this difficulty. According to doc.3, it can increase the | volume and plausibility of fabricated material and facilitate targeted persuasion during elections. It might also weaken trust in genuine evidence | by making everything seem potentially artificial. Yet disinformation predates these tools, and producing content does not guarantee changing votes. The | article consequently questions predictions of inevitable democratic collapse rather than dismissing the risks. Education offers a response, provided it teaches | investigation rather than either automatic belief or universal suspicion. In doc.4, pupils repeatedly practise media literacy instead of receiving a | single warning about unreliable websites. Being familiar with digital devices is not enough, and vulnerability is not confined to the | young. Checking who produced a claim, comparing independent sources and reading beyond the first result can make evaluation more deliberate. | These approaches address different parts of the same problem. Age influences where news is encountered, confidence can conceal weak judgment, | and new tools expand the possibilities of deception. Verification skills can limit these vulnerabilities without promising perfect protection. The shared | challenge is to preserve justified trust: readers need reasons for accepting information, but also ways to question it without concluding | that no source can be believed. This requires sustained learning and caution about both alarming technological predictions and comforting assumptions | about personal competence.

Nombre de mots, titre inclus : 383.

Lecture du dossier

La synthèse distingue les données britanniques du graphique et l’enquête américaine. La catégorie « online » inclut les réseaux sociaux : il ne faut pas additionner ces deux séries. Elle relie les quatre pièces à une même question : comment maintenir une confiance justifiée face à la désinformation ?