INSP Orient : corrigé du sujet zéro d’anglais

Proposition de corrigé — non officielle. INSP, concours externe, voie Orient, sujet zéro V0 d’anglais sans session datée : quatre questions, durée indicative 3 h, coefficient 2.

Ouvrir le sujet officiel · Télécharger une copie du sujet · Retrouver les annales

Un sujet zéro, quatre réponses en anglais

Le document porte la mention « Sujet V0 », sans année de session. Il annonce 3 heures et un coefficient 2, mais aucun barème par question. Les réponses ci-dessous illustrent une argumentation possible ; elles utilisent, pour la dernière question, une référence de 2024 explicitement datée.

1. France and digital sovereignty

France has some capacity to set rules and protect its digital infrastructure, but this does not amount to complete technological independence. Public services and businesses depend on international suppliers for semiconductors, software and cloud services. Such dependencies may create risks when essential data or infrastructure cannot easily be moved to another provider.

Digital sovereignty should therefore mean the ability to make and enforce choices rather than producing everything within national borders. France can strengthen this ability by investing in skills, research and secure infrastructure, requiring appropriate safeguards for sensitive data, and reducing dependence on a single supplier. Cooperation with European partners can increase the scale of these efforts.

However, protection must remain compatible with competition, innovation and individual rights. An isolated national market could become less efficient without becoming safer. France is thus partly sovereign in the digital arena, but sovereignty is an ongoing capacity to manage interdependence, not a completed state of independence.

Pourquoi cette réponse fonctionne : elle distingue souveraineté et autarcie, identifie les dépendances et propose des leviers sans prétendre que tous les équipements français seraient autonomes.

2. The role of diasporas

Diasporas can connect countries through family ties, professional networks, cultural activities and investment. Their members may support relatives, transfer knowledge or help organisations understand different markets and societies. These connections can benefit both countries of origin and countries of residence.

Public authorities should facilitate voluntary cooperation, for example through research exchanges and transparent opportunities to support local projects. Yet they should not treat a diaspora as a single community with uniform views. Individuals have different experiences and identities, and some may have left their country because of persecution or conflict.

Diasporas should therefore be recognised as potential partners, not required to act as representatives of a government. Their contribution is strongest when freedom of expression, equal citizenship and personal choice are protected. Successful policies enable participation without imposing loyalty tests or transferring public responsibilities to families abroad.

Point à retenir : les diasporas ne constituent ni un bloc homogène ni un instrument diplomatique disponible sur commande. La contribution doit rester volontaire.

3. International mobility of artists

International mobility allows artists to encounter different audiences, methods and cultural traditions. Residencies and collaborative projects can create work that would not emerge in isolation. Mobility also helps cultural institutions build lasting relationships and enables audiences to discover unfamiliar perspectives.

Support is justified when it removes barriers rather than merely subsidising those already able to travel. Smaller organisations and artists with limited resources may need help with travel costs, administrative procedures and access to professional networks. Fair payment and clear working conditions matter as much as the journey itself.

However, mobility is not an end in itself. Programmes should consider environmental costs, unequal access to visas and the value of sustained cooperation. Longer stays, shared projects and some remote exchanges may provide better results than repeated short visits. The aim is to support cultural dialogue and artistic freedom while making participation more equitable.

Point à retenir : défendre la mobilité implique aussi d’en discuter les conditions : accès, rémunération, visas et impact environnemental. La Déclaration de l’UNESCO sur la diversité culturelle fournit un cadre pour articuler diversité et droits.

4. Zero hunger by 2030

Zero hunger is a necessary objective, but achieving it by 2030 requires a major change in current trends. The United Nations’ 2024 report on the Sustainable Development Goals showed that the world was not on track. Hunger is not simply a matter of producing enough food: conflict, poverty and disrupted supply chains can prevent people from accessing it.

Progress therefore requires several coordinated policies. Preventing conflict and protecting humanitarian access are essential in emergencies. Social protection, resilient agriculture, reliable infrastructure and measures against food waste can improve access over time. Climate adaptation must also support communities whose livelihoods are particularly exposed.

The deadline is highly challenging under the conditions described in 2024, but this does not justify abandoning the goal. It provides a common direction and makes governments accountable. A realistic approach acknowledges the gap, prioritises vulnerable populations and measures results rather than treating a formal commitment as evidence of success.

Repère de date : cette réponse s’appuie sur le rapport ONU 2024 sur les objectifs de développement durable. Elle ne suppose pas que le sujet zéro aurait été composé en 2024, ni qu’un nombre de points serait attribué à cette question.